22 Facts About Biomass energy

1.

Biomass energy is plant-based material used as fuel to produce heat or electricity.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,804
2.

The IEA argued that the current rate of bioBiomass energy deployment is well below the levels required in future low carbon scenarios, and that accelerated deployment is urgently needed.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,805
3.

In 2014, IRENA projected a doubling of energy produced from biomass in 2030, with a small contribution from traditional bioenergy .

FactSnippet No. 1,431,806
4.

The IEA argues that traditional bioBiomass energy is not sustainable and in its Net Zero by 2050 scenario it is phased out already in 2030.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,807
5.

Biofuel from food crops harvested for Biomass energy is called "first-generation" or "traditional" biofuel, and has relatively low emission savings.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,808
6.

Biomass energy pyrolysis produces fuels such as bio-oil, charcoal, methane, and hydrogen.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,809
7.

Net carbon debt for the bioBiomass energy scenario is calculated when the net amount of carbon stored in the forest protection scenario's carbon pool is larger than the net amount of carbon stored in the bioBiomass energy scenario's carbon pools.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,810
8.

The EU's published greenhouse gas savings percentages for specific bioBiomass energy pathways used in the Renewable Energy Directive and other legal documents are based on life cycle assessments .

FactSnippet No. 1,431,811
9.

Where growth rates are relatively high and the investment response strong, net GHG benefits from increased use of trees for Biomass energy can be realized within a decade or two, depending on the fossil fuel being displaced and the timing of the investment response.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,812
10.

See chart on the right for an overview over expected emission reductions from different forest bioBiomass energy pathways, including stemwood, residues and new plantations, compared against Biomass energy generation from coal and natural gas in the alternative scenarios.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,813
11.

The bioBiomass energy scenario was compared against an alternative reference scenario where the residues either were left in the forests to decay naturally, or was incinerated at the roadside.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,814
12.

The bioBiomass energy scenarios had carbon parity times of 12 to 46 years when compared to different alternative scenarios where the forest was instead protected and the electricity produced by coal plants.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,815
13.

EU's Joint Research Centre has examined a number of bioBiomass energy emission estimates found in literature, and calculated greenhouse gas savings percentages for bioBiomass energy pathways in heat production, transportation fuel production and electricity production, based on those studies .

FactSnippet No. 1,431,816
14.

The increased humidity causes more of the incoming solar Biomass energy to be spent evaporating water rather than heating the ground, thereby creating a cooling effect.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,817
15.

Environmental impact caused by biomass or other renewable energy production depends to some extent on its land use requirements.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,818
16.

However, a shift to modern bioBiomass energy contribute to improved livelihoods and can reduce land degradation and impacts on ecosystem services.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,819
17.

Likewise, the IEA argue that traditional bioBiomass energy is inefficient and that the phasing out of this Biomass energy source both have large health benefits and large economic benefits.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,820
18.

Smokestack emissions per produced Biomass energy unit depend on moisture content in the fuel, chemical differences between fuels and conversion efficiencies.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,821
19.

When this is the case, more of the wood's inherent Biomass energy must be spent solely on evaporating moisture, compared to the drier coal, which means that the amount of CO2 emitted per unit produced heat will be higher.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,822
20.

When forest products are in demand and forests therefore are managed for timber production, the most realistic no-bioBiomass energy scenario is not forest protection but continued timber production without residues collection and utilization.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,823
21.

Likewise, IEA BioBiomass energy criticizes EASAC for ignoring the carbon absorption that is happening in the forest landscape, noting that there is no net loss of carbon if the annual harvest is smaller than the forest's annual growth.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,824
22.

Limited or no bioBiomass energy pathways leads to increased climate change or shifting bioBiomass energy's mitigation load to other sectors.

FactSnippet No. 1,431,825