16 Facts About Organizing model

Organizing model, as the term refers to trade unions, is a broad conception of how those organizations should recruit, operate, and advance the interests of their members, though the specific functions of the model are more detailed and are discussed at length below.

The organizing model is strongly linked to social movement unionism and community unionism.

The organizing model contributes to the discussion of how trade unions can reverse the trend of declining membership, which they are experiencing in most industrial nations, and how they can recapture some of the political power, which the labor movement has lost over the past century.

Organizing model is frequently compared and contrasted with other methods of union organization, such as the servicing model.

Development of the organizing model is as opposed to the servicing model, and there are various differences between the two models for union structure.

Related searches

David Peetz and Barbara Pocock state that the ways these various countries implemented the organizing model were quite different, and the model looked slightly different based upon these minor discrepancies.

The tactics and strategies of the SEIU and Justice for Janitors go beyond the organizing model which is, as has been described, an approach to local-level organizing and campaigning.

Bob Carter and Rae Cooper state that Organizing Works was successful in spreading the message of the model and recruiting new members for unions, and in general, Australian unions were more committed to the organizing model than were British unions.

Peetz and Pocock emphasize that the organizing model was implemented differently in different Australian unions and that the aspects of the organizing model that got implemented differed by union.

The organizing model was present in many British unions in the 2000s, and the workers were aware of its presence.

The British union members largely felt that the organizing model was a good model to have implemented in their unions, and they were satisfied with its results.

Heery, Simms, Simpson, Delbridge, and Salmon assert that the organizing model has several key advantages that distinguish it from the servicing model, such as the fact that the organizing model promotes "systematic", proactive, and well-thought out campaigns, which help the union's goals get satisfactorily and pragmatically achieved.

Heery, Simms, Simpson, Delbridge, and Salmon list several disadvantages of the union organizing model, with the most critical being that the model is very "resource-intensive", in terms of both people and money.

Since the organizing model is, at its core, about people, rather than services, it cannot be effective without people to both implement it and carry it out.

Critics argue that the organizing model is inappropriate to the task of unions in the modern global economy.

Note: the organizing model is claimed by a very broad group of bodies, this list will be indicative only:.