An important issue for philosophical logic is the question of how to classify the great variety of non-classical logical systems, many of which are of rather recent origin.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,090 |
An important issue for philosophical logic is the question of how to classify the great variety of non-classical logical systems, many of which are of rather recent origin.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,090 |
Deontic Philosophical logic pertains to ethics and provides a formal treatment of ethical notions, such as obligation and permission.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,091 |
Intuitionistic Philosophical logic is based on the idea that truth depends on verification through a proof.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,092 |
When understood in a narrow sense, as discussed in this article, philosophical logic is the area of philosophy that studies the application of logical methods to philosophical problems.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,093 |
Different systems of Philosophical logic provide different accounts for when an inference is valid.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,094 |
For some, classical logic is too narrow: it leaves out many philosophically interesting issues.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,095 |
Treatises on modern Philosophical logic often treat these different systems as a list of separate topics without providing a clear classification of them.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,096 |
Classical logic is not an independent topic within philosophical logic.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,097 |
Classical Philosophical logic was initially created in order to analyze mathematical arguments and was applied to various other fields only afterward.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,098 |
The different forms of modal Philosophical logic are often presented as a nested hierarchy of systems in which the most fundamental systems, like system K, include only the most fundamental axioms while other systems, like the popular system S5, build on top of it by including additional axioms.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,099 |
Deontic Philosophical logic usually expresses these ideas with the operators and.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,100 |
Just as in alethic modal logic, there is a discussion in philosophical logic concerning which is the right system of axioms for expressing the common intuitions governing deontic inferences.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,101 |
Temporal modal Philosophical logic can be translated into classical first-order Philosophical logic by treating time in the form of a singular term and increasing the arity of one's predicates by one.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,102 |
Epistemic Philosophical logic is a form of modal Philosophical logic applied to the field of epistemology.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,103 |
Dynamic epistemic Philosophical logic is a distinct form of epistemic Philosophical logic that focuses on situations in which changes in belief and knowledge happen.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,104 |
Intuitionistic Philosophical logic is a more restricted version of classical Philosophical logic.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,105 |
Free Philosophical logic rejects some of the existential presuppositions found in classical Philosophical logic.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,106 |
Free Philosophical logic avoids these problems by allowing formulas with non-denoting singular terms.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,107 |
On this view, classical predicate Philosophical logic introduces predicates with an empty extension while free Philosophical logic introduces singular terms of non-existing things.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,108 |
Formal semantics of classical Philosophical logic can define the truth of their expressions in terms of their denotation.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,109 |
Relevance Philosophical logic tries to avoid these cases by requiring that for a true material conditional, its antecedent has to be relevant to the consequent.
FactSnippet No. 1,556,110 |