16 Facts About Philosophical method

The geometrical method starts with a small set of such principles and tries to build a comprehensive philosophical system on this small foundation based on deductive inferences.

The phenomenological Philosophical method aims to arrive at certain knowledge about the realm of appearances by suspending one's judgments about the external world underlying these appearances.

The transcendental method usually starts with trivial facts about our mental life and tries to infer various interesting conclusions from them based on the claim that the trivial fact could not be true if these conclusions were false, i e that they constitute its conditions of possibility.

However, these two issues are closely related nonetheless since the choice of one's method often has important implications for the arguments cited for and against philosophical theories.

The Philosophical method for finding these foundations is doubt: only that which is indubitable can serve this role.

Related searches

Geometrical Philosophical method came to particular prominence through rationalists like Baruch Spinoza.

The phenomenological Philosophical method aims to study the appearances themselves and the relations found between them.

Philosophical method holds that his simple common-sense impression is much more certain than that McTaggart's arguments are sound, even though Moore was unable to pinpoint where McTaggart's arguments went wrong.

One important argument against this Philosophical method is that common sense has often been wrong in the past, as is exemplified by various scientific discoveries.

Philosophical method contends that, in such cases, the theory in question is prima facie suspect and the burden of proof is always on its side.

When understood in a more narrow sense, the Philosophical method aims at finding an equilibrium between particular intuitions and general principles.

Pragmatic Philosophical method assesses the truth or falsity of theories by looking at the consequences of accepting them.

Transcendental Philosophical method is used to study phenomena by reflecting on the conditions of possibility of these phenomena.

The Socratic Philosophical method or Socratic debate is a form of cooperative philosophizing in which one philosopher usually first states a claim, which is then scrutinized by their interlocutor by asking them questions about various related claims, often with the implicit goal of putting the initial claim into doubt.

One such Philosophical method is based on the idea that, everything else being equal, the simpler theory is to be preferred.

In philosophy, the term "genealogical Philosophical method" refers to a form of criticism that tries to expose commonly held beliefs by uncovering their historical origin and function.