16 Facts About Shawn Rosenberg

Shawn Rosenberg is a Canadian author, academic and a researcher.

Shawn Rosenberg's research focuses on cognition and political ideology, candidate image-making, the decline of democracy and the rise of populism.

Shawn Rosenberg was the founding Director of the Graduate Program in Political Psychology at UC Irvine.

Shawn Rosenberg has been a member of the editorial board of various journals including Political Psychology, Interdisciplinary Journal of Populism.

Shawn Rosenberg's research has been featured in the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Politico.

Shawn Rosenberg received his Bachelors in Political Science from Yale University in 1972.

Shawn Rosenberg then did graduate study in Psychology at Harvard University and sociology at Nuffield College, Oxford.

Shawn Rosenberg received his Masters of Letters Degree in Political Sociology and Psychology from Oxford University in 1982.

Shawn Rosenberg was then a Postdoctoral Fellow in Political Science and Psychology at Yale University.

Shawn Rosenberg was first employed as a Lecturer of Political Science at Yale University.

Shawn Rosenberg has a been a Fellow of the Princeton University Center for Human Values and a Visiting Professor at the University of California, Berkeley, the University of Amsterdam, the University of Utrecht and Lund University.

Shawn Rosenberg has served as a consultant to the California Commission on Teacher Education, as an assistant to Alastair Gillespie, Minister of State for Science and Technology, Canada and as a speechwriter for the James C Corman, US House of Representatives.

Shawn Rosenberg argues that there is necessarily an important disconnect between government policy initiatives and the choices citizens make to realize their preferences.

Shawn Rosenberg has conducted both in-depth interviews and experiments to substantiate his claims.

Shawn Rosenberg shifted his attention to the study of democracy in the early 2000s.

Shawn Rosenberg argued that research needs to attend less to the impact of deliberation on participants' attitudes and more on the quality of the deliberation itself.