Several links to other Sino-Tibetan language families have been proposed, but none have broad acceptance.
FactSnippet No. 1,331,093 |
Several links to other Sino-Tibetan language families have been proposed, but none have broad acceptance.
FactSnippet No. 1,331,093 |
Sino-Tibetan language divided them into three groups: Tibeto-Burman, Chinese and Tai, and was uncertain about the affinity of Karen and Hmong–Mien.
FactSnippet No. 1,331,094 |
The English translation "Sino-Tibetan language" first appeared in a short note by Przyluski and Luce in 1931.
FactSnippet No. 1,331,095 |
Sino-Tibetan language reconstructed a two-way distinction on initial consonants based on voicing, with aspiration conditioned by pre-initial consonants that had been retained in Tibetic but lost in many other languages.
FactSnippet No. 1,331,096 |
Sino-Tibetan language otherwise retained the outlines of Conrady's Indo-Chinese classification, though putting Karen in an intermediate position:.
FactSnippet No. 1,331,097 |
Sino-Tibetan language proposed a detailed classification, with six top-level divisions:.
FactSnippet No. 1,331,098 |
Internal structure of Sino-Tibetan language has been tentatively revised as the following Stammbaum by Matisoff in the final print release of the Sino-Tibetan language Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus .
FactSnippet No. 1,331,099 |
Sino-Tibetan language calls the entire family "Tibeto-Burman", a name he says has historical primacy, but other linguists who reject a privileged position for Chinese nevertheless continue to call the resulting family "Sino-Tibetan".
FactSnippet No. 1,331,100 |
Sino-Tibetan language has proposed several hypotheses, including the reclassification of Chinese to a Sino-Bodic subgroup:.
FactSnippet No. 1,331,101 |
Van Driem suggested that the Sino-Tibetan language family be renamed "Trans-Himalayan", which he considers to be more neutral.
FactSnippet No. 1,331,102 |