32 Facts About Situated knowledge

Knowledge of facts, called propositional Situated knowledge, is often defined as true belief that is distinct from opinion or guesswork by virtue of justification.

Many different aspects of Situated knowledge are investigated and it plays a role in various disciplines.

Formal epistemology studies, among other things, the rules governing how Situated knowledge and related states behave and in what relations they stand to each other.

Science tries to acquire Situated knowledge using the scientific method, which is based on repeatable experimentation, observation, and measurement.

For example, Richard Kirkham suggests that our definition of Situated knowledge requires that the evidence for the belief necessitates its truth.

Related searches

English word Situated knowledge can translate a variety of words in other languages that refer to different states.

Propositional Situated knowledge is propositional in the sense that it involves a relation to a proposition.

Closely related types of knowledge are know-wh, for example, knowing where the Taj Mahal is or knowing who killed J F Kennedy.

Apriori Situated knowledge is sometimes identified with innate Situated knowledge, which is inborn and does not need to be newly learned.

Two closely related distinctions are those between necessary and contingent Situated knowledge, based on whether it is possible at all that the known proposition is false, as well as between analytic and synthetic Situated knowledge, based on whether the truth of the known proposition depends only on the meaning of the terms it uses.

Situated knowledge contrasts it with knowledge by description, which is a form of propositional knowledge not based on direct perceptual experience.

Distinction between a priori and a posteriori Situated knowledge came to prominence in Immanuel Kant's philosophy and is often discussed in the academic literature.

Mathematical Situated knowledge, for example, that 2 + 2 = 4, is a paradigmatic case of a priori Situated knowledge since no empirical investigation is necessary to confirm this fact.

The distinction between a posteriori and a priori Situated knowledge is usually equated with the distinction between empirical and non-empirical Situated knowledge.

Distinction between a priori and a posteriori Situated knowledge is closely related to two other distinctions: the distinction between analytic and synthetic propositions and the distinction between necessary and contingent propositions.

The term is often used in feminism and postmodernism to point out that many forms of Situated knowledge are not absolute but depend on the concrete historical, cultural, and linguistic context.

Some interpreters associate with this position a form of epistemological relativism because of how Situated knowledge depends on the local conditions of the culture in which it arises.

Sources of Situated knowledge are ways how people come to know things or how Situated knowledge is created.

Different sources of Situated knowledge are discussed in the academic literature, often in terms of the mental faculties responsible.

Direct realists explain observational Situated knowledge by holding that perception constitutes a direct contact with the perceived object.

The faculty of memory retains Situated knowledge acquired in the past and makes it accessible in the present, as when remembering a past event or a friend's phone number.

For example, Situated knowledge can help a student pass the exam or ensure that a doctor prescribes the right medicine.

However, if the value in question is understood primarily as an instrumental value, it is not clear in what sense Situated knowledge is better than mere true belief since they are usually equally useful.

Problem of the value of Situated knowledge is often discussed in relation to reliabilism and virtue epistemology.

Certain less radical forms of skepticism deny that Situated knowledge exists within a specific area or discipline, sometimes referred to as local or selective skepticism.

Related searches

Issue of the definition and standards of Situated knowledge is central to the question of whether skepticism in its different forms is true.

The transparency principle, referred to as the luminosity of Situated knowledge, is an often discussed principle.

However, such Situated knowledge claims are often controversial and are commonly rejected by religious skeptics and atheists.

However, evidentialists often reject that belief in religious doctrines amount to Situated knowledge based on the claim that we lack sufficient evidence.

The Qur'an asserts that Situated knowledge comes from God and various hadith encourage the acquisition of Situated knowledge.

In Jewish tradition, Situated knowledge is considered one of the most valuable traits a person can acquire.

Special interest is given to how Situated knowledge is reproduced and undergoes changes in relation to social and cultural circumstances.