Sky Angel was a U S operator of Christian television networks; it operated three channels, Angel One, Angel Two, and KTV, all of which were exclusive to Dish Network.
| FactSnippet No. 1,495,715 |
Sky Angel was a U S operator of Christian television networks; it operated three channels, Angel One, Angel Two, and KTV, all of which were exclusive to Dish Network.
| FactSnippet No. 1,495,715 |
On January 14,2014, Sky Angel ceased its IPTV business, citing that because it did not fall under the traditional legal definition of a multichannel video programming distributor, it was unable to employ legal remedies for its allegations that broadcasters were discriminating against its business model by preventing carriage of their channels.
| FactSnippet No. 1,495,716 |
Sky Angel reached around 115,000 subscribers, mostly within the Central United States.
| FactSnippet No. 1,495,717 |
On July 10,2007, Sky Angel launched a separate IPTV service in the United States.
| FactSnippet No. 1,495,719 |
Sky Angel has contemplated offering internet and mobile television services, but declined to do so.
| FactSnippet No. 1,495,720 |
Sky Angel introduced a new spin-off service known as FAVE TV —a secular service which aimed to carry "mainstream" and "family-friendly" television channels.
| FactSnippet No. 1,495,721 |
On January 14,2014, Sky Angel suspended its television services; in an FCC complaint, the company detailed that it had been unable to offer a competitive service to its subscribers because content providers had refused to allow the provider to "acquire programming in a fair and nondiscriminatory way".
| FactSnippet No. 1,495,722 |
Sky Angel offered satellite service with monthly, yearly or lifelong plans.
| FactSnippet No. 1,495,723 |
In November 2012, Sky Angel filed an antitrust lawsuit against the network claiming that its owners pulled its programming from Sky Angel to put the service at a disadvantage against its conventional rivals.
| FactSnippet No. 1,495,724 |
The court dismissed the case without prejudice, believing that Sky Angel's case did not have enough evidence to justify its claims that C-SPAN's owners were trying to enforce a monopoly position.
| FactSnippet No. 1,495,725 |
The claims were rejected, with the court arguing that Sky Angel had produced no actual evidence of collusion among the C-SPAN consortium.
| FactSnippet No. 1,495,726 |