12 Facts About Sky Angel

1.

Sky Angel was a U S operator of Christian television networks; it operated three channels, Angel One, Angel Two, and KTV, all of which were exclusive to Dish Network.

FactSnippet No. 1,495,715
2.

On January 14,2014, Sky Angel ceased its IPTV business, citing that because it did not fall under the traditional legal definition of a multichannel video programming distributor, it was unable to employ legal remedies for its allegations that broadcasters were discriminating against its business model by preventing carriage of their channels.

FactSnippet No. 1,495,716
3.

Sky Angel reached around 115,000 subscribers, mostly within the Central United States.

FactSnippet No. 1,495,717
4.

On January 22,2007, Sky Angel partnered with ShifTV to launch Sky Angel IPTV service in Canada.

FactSnippet No. 1,495,718
5.

On July 10,2007, Sky Angel launched a separate IPTV service in the United States.

FactSnippet No. 1,495,719
6.

Sky Angel has contemplated offering internet and mobile television services, but declined to do so.

FactSnippet No. 1,495,720
7.

Sky Angel introduced a new spin-off service known as FAVE TV —a secular service which aimed to carry "mainstream" and "family-friendly" television channels.

FactSnippet No. 1,495,721
8.

On January 14,2014, Sky Angel suspended its television services; in an FCC complaint, the company detailed that it had been unable to offer a competitive service to its subscribers because content providers had refused to allow the provider to "acquire programming in a fair and nondiscriminatory way".

FactSnippet No. 1,495,722
9.

Sky Angel offered satellite service with monthly, yearly or lifelong plans.

FactSnippet No. 1,495,723
10.

In November 2012, Sky Angel filed an antitrust lawsuit against the network claiming that its owners pulled its programming from Sky Angel to put the service at a disadvantage against its conventional rivals.

FactSnippet No. 1,495,724
11.

The court dismissed the case without prejudice, believing that Sky Angel's case did not have enough evidence to justify its claims that C-SPAN's owners were trying to enforce a monopoly position.

FactSnippet No. 1,495,725
12.

The claims were rejected, with the court arguing that Sky Angel had produced no actual evidence of collusion among the C-SPAN consortium.

FactSnippet No. 1,495,726