10 Facts About Victims' rights

Supporters of these causes helped form the grassroots foundation of the modern victims' rights movement, providing educational resources and legal assistance, and establishing the country's first hotlines and shelters for victims of crime.

Victims' rights organizations do ground-level advocacy, providing individual victims with legal guidance and support, and educate future legal professionals on issues related to victims' rights.

In 2004, the landmark Crime Victims' Rights Act was passed, granting crime victims eight specific rights, and providing standing for individual victims to assert those rights in court.

Crime Victims' Rights Act, part of the Justice for All Act of 2004, enumerates the rights afforded to victims in federal criminal cases.

Crime Victims' Rights Act was named for Scott Campbell, Stephanie Roper, Wendy Preston, Louarna Gillis, and Nila Lynn, murder victims whose families were denied some or all of the rights granted by the Act in the course of their cases.

Therefore, the German Code of Criminal Procedure 1987 gives victims a number of Victims' rights, including the right to participate in the trial; the right to appeal after the conclusion of the trial; and the right to seek compensation for their loss.

Victims Victims' rights are outlined by the Code of Penal Procedure which details that during the prosecution and sentencing stages, victims have the right to be informed of judicial proceeding developments and can produce evidence at any stage of the trial.

Victims' rights are actively enforced during the different stages of the criminal justice process, including: during the investigation of a crime, during a trial and after a trial.

Various procedural elements allow for victim compensation and institutional obligation to protect victim Victims' rights through policing, criminal proceedings and victim rehabilitation.

Proponents of victims' rights respond by noting that victims' rights of privacy, protection and participation are civil rights that ensure that individual harm is among the harms recognized by the system, and that such rights afford a voice in the process, not a veto of enforcement discretion.