16 Facts About Beeching cuts


Beeching cuts was a plan to increase the efficiency of the nationalised railway system in Great Britain.

FactSnippet No. 946,171

Protests resulted in the saving of some stations and lines, but the majority were closed as planned; Beeching cuts's name remains associated with the mass closure of railways and the loss of many local services in the period that followed.

FactSnippet No. 946,172

Beeching cuts first studied traffic flows on all lines to identify "the good, the bad, and the indifferent".

FactSnippet No. 946,173

Beeching cuts recommended that freight services should mainly be for bulk commodities such as minerals and coal, and that the freight system make use of new containerised handling systems rather than less efficient and slower wagon-load traffic.

FactSnippet No. 946,174

On 16 February 1965, Beeching cuts introduced the second stage of his reorganisation of the railways.

FactSnippet No. 946,175

Underpinning Beeching cuts's proposals was his belief that there was too much duplication in the railway network: "The real choice is between an excessive and increasingly un-economic system, with a corresponding tendency for the railways as a whole to fall into disrepute and decay, or the selective development and intensive utilisation of a more limited trunk route system".

FactSnippet No. 946,176

Frank Cousins, the Labour Minister of Technology, told the House of Commons in November 1965 that Beeching cuts had been dismissed by Tom Fraser, then Minister of Transport.

FactSnippet No. 946,177

Beeching cuts denied this, pointing out that he had returned early to ICI as he would not have had enough time to undertake an in-depth transport study before the formal end of his secondment.

FactSnippet No. 946,178

Beeching cuts Report was intended to be the first stage in the rail network's contraction.

FactSnippet No. 946,179

Beeching cuts's reports made no recommendations about the handling of land after closures.

FactSnippet No. 946,180

Critics of Beeching cuts argue that the lack of recommendations on the handling of closed railway property demonstrates that the report was short-sighted.

FactSnippet No. 946,181

Marshlink line between Ashford International and Hastings, threatened with closure in the Beeching cuts Report, is seen as important due to the opening of the Channel Tunnel and High Speed 1.

FactSnippet No. 946,182

Stedeford and Beeching cuts clashed on a number of issues, but the future size of the railway system was not one of them.

FactSnippet No. 946,183

In 1982, under the government of Margaret Thatcher, Sir David Serpell, a civil servant who had worked with Beeching cuts, compiled the Serpell Report which said that a profitable railway could be achieved only by closing much of what remained.

FactSnippet No. 946,184

Ian Hislop comments that history has been somewhat unkind to "Britain's most hated civil servant", by forgetting that Beeching cuts proposed a much better bus service that ministers never delivered, and that in some ways he was used to do their "dirty work for them".

FactSnippet No. 946,185

Beeching cuts was unrepentant about his role in the closures: "I suppose I'll always be looked upon as the axe man, but it was surgery, not mad chopping".

FactSnippet No. 946,186