35 Facts About COBOL 2002

COBOL 2002 is a compiled English-like computer programming language designed for business use.

COBOL 2002 is primarily used in business, finance, and administrative systems for companies and governments.

COBOL 2002 is still widely used in applications deployed on mainframe computers, such as large-scale batch and transaction processing jobs.

COBOL 2002 was designed in 1959 by CODASYL and was partly based on the programming language FLOW-MATIC designed by Grace Hopper.

COBOL 2002 statements have an English-like syntax, which was designed to be self-documenting and highly readable.

Related searches

COBOL 2002 code is split into four divisions containing a rigid hierarchy of sections, paragraphs and sentences.

Academic computer scientists were generally uninterested in business applications when COBOL 2002 was created and were not involved in its design; it was designed from the ground up as a computer language for business, with an emphasis on inputs and outputs, whose only data types were numbers and strings of text.

COBOL 2002 has been criticized throughout its life for its verbosity, design process, and poor support for structured programming.

Years, COBOL 2002 has been assumed as a programming language for business operations in mainframes, although in recent years an increasing interest has surged on migrating COBOL 2002 operations to cloud computing.

FLOW-MATIC's major contributions to COBOL 2002 were long variable names, English words for commands and the separation of data descriptions and instructions.

Features from COMTRAN incorporated into COBOL 2002 included formulas, the PICTURE clause, an improved IF statement, which obviated the need for GO TOs, and a more robust file management system.

On 6 and 7 December, the same COBOL 2002 program ran on an RCA computer and a Remington-Rand Univac computer, demonstrating that compatibility could be achieved.

COBOL 2002 is an industry language and is not the property of any company or group of companies, or of any organization or group of organizations.

Many logical flaws were found in COBOL 2002 60, leading General Electric's Charles Katz to warn that it could not be interpreted unambiguously.

In late 1962, IBM announced that COBOL 2002 would be their primary development language and that development of COMTRAN would cease.

COBOL 2002 specification was revised three times in the five years after its publication.

The vice-president, William Rinehuls, complained that two-thirds of the COBOL 2002 community did not know of the committee's existence.

In 1974, ANSI published a revised version of COBOL 2002, containing new features such as file organizations, the DELETE statement and the segmentation module.

The report writer was slated to be removed from COBOL 2002, but was reinstated before the standard was published.

COBOL 2002 suffered from poor support: no compilers completely supported the standard.

The particular level of effort required to correct COBOL 2002 code has been attributed to the large amount of business-oriented COBOL 2002, as business applications use dates heavily, and to fixed-length data fields.

Similarly, the US Internal Revenue Service rushed to patch its COBOL 2002-based Individual Master File in order to disburse the tens of millions of payments mandated by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act.

COBOL 2002 has an English-like syntax, which is used to describe nearly everything in a program.

Each COBOL 2002 program is made up of four basic lexical items: words, literals, picture character-strings and separators.

COBOL 2002 program is split into four divisions: the identification division, the environment division, the data division and the procedure division.

Related searches

COBOL 2002's syntax is usually described with a unique metalanguage using braces, brackets, bars and underlining.

Data items in COBOL 2002 are declared hierarchically through the use of level-numbers which indicate if a data item is part of another.

Attempts to remove GO TOs from COBOL 2002 code resulted in convoluted programs and reduced code quality.

COBOL 2002 programs were infamous for being monolithic and lacking modularization.

Nevertheless, much important legacy COBOL 2002 software uses unstructured code, which has become unmaintainable.

COBOL 2002 was intended to be a highly portable, "common" language.

COBOL 2002 was intended to be easy for programmers to learn and use, while still being readable to non-technical staff such as managers.

COBOL 2002 community has always been isolated from the computer science community.

Later, COBOL suffered from a shortage of material covering it; it took until 1963 for introductory books to appear .

COBOL standards have repeatedly suffered from delays: COBOL-85 arrived five years later than hoped, COBOL 2002 was five years late, and COBOL 2014 was six years late.