49 Facts About Hans Eysenck

Hans Jurgen Eysenck was a German-born British psychologist who spent his professional career in Great Britain.

Hans Eysenck is best remembered for his work on intelligence and personality, although he worked on other issues in psychology.

At the time of his death, Eysenck was the most frequently cited living psychologist in the peer-reviewed scientific journal literature.

Hans Eysenck's research purported to show that certain personality types had an elevated risk of cancer and heart disease.

An enquiry on behalf of King's College London found the papers by Hans Eysenck to be "incompatible with modern clinical science".

David Marks and Rod Buchanan, a biographer of Hans Eysenck, have argued that 87 publications by Hans Eysenck should be retracted.

Hans Eysenck believed IQ scores were hereditary and genetically influenced by biological race.

Hans Eysenck had cited studies which claimed black children's average IQ score was 12 points lower than white children.

Hans Eysenck's writing on this belief was used as justification for discriminatory schooling in Britain in the 1970s.

Hans Eysenck's mother was Silesian-born film star Helga Molander, and his father, Eduard Anton Eysenck, was an actor and nightclub entertainer who was once voted "handsomest man on the Baltic coast".

Hans Eysenck's mother was Lutheran and his father was Catholic.

Hans Eysenck was brought up by his maternal grandmother who was a Jewish convert to Catholicism.

Hans Eysenck received his PhD in 1940 from University College London working in the Department of Psychology under the supervision of Professor Sir Cyril Burt, with whom he had a tumultuous professional relationship throughout his working life.

Hans Eysenck was Professor of Psychology at the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, from 1955 to 1983.

Hans Eysenck was a major contributor to the modern scientific theory of personality and a brilliant teacher who helped find treatment for mental illnesses.

Hans Eysenck created and developed a distinctive dimensional model of personality structure based on empirical factor-analytic research, attempting to anchor these factors in biogenetic variation.

In 1981, Hans Eysenck became a founding member of the World Cultural Council.

Hans Eysenck was the founding editor of the international journal Personality and Individual Differences, and wrote about 80 books and more than 1,600 journal articles.

Hans Eysenck had four children with his second wife, Sybil Eysenck: Gary, Connie, Kevin, and Darrin.

Hans and Sybil Eysenck collaborated as psychologists for many years at the Institute of Psychiatry, University of London, as co-authors and researchers.

Sybil Eysenck died in December 2020, and Hans Eysenck died of a brain tumour in a London hospice in 1997.

The Hans Eysenck's home was at 10 Dorchester Drive, Herne Hill, London from 1960 until their respective deaths.

Examples of publications in which Hans Eysenck's views roused controversy include :.

Hans Eysenck suggests that the latter is a result of a person's introversion or extraversion respectively.

Hans Eysenck advocated a strong influence from genetics and race on IQ differences.

Hans Eysenck supported Arthur Jensen's questioning of whether variation in IQ between racial groups was entirely environmental.

In opposition to this position, Hans Eysenck was punched in the face by a protester during a talk at the London School of Economics.

Hans Eysenck received bomb threats and threats to kill his young children.

Hans Eysenck claimed that the media had given people the misleading impression that his views were outside the mainstream scientific consensus.

Hans Eysenck cited The IQ Controversy, the Media and Public Policy as showing that there was majority support for all of the main contentions he had put forward, and further claimed that there was no real debate about the matter among relevant scientists.

Hans Eysenck noted how these two dimensions were similar to the four personality types first proposed by the Greek physician Galen.

Hans Eysenck's model attempted to provide detailed theory of the causes of personality.

For example, Hans Eysenck proposed that extraversion was caused by variability in cortical arousal: "introverts are characterized by higher levels of activity than extraverts and so are chronically more cortically aroused than extraverts".

Similarly, Hans Eysenck proposed that location within the neuroticism dimension was determined by individual differences in the limbic system.

Hans Eysenck argued that his approach was a better description of personality.

Hans Eysenck was accused of being a supporter of political causes on the extreme right.

In 1974, Hans Eysenck became a member of the academic advisory council of Mankind Quarterly, joining those associated with the journal in attempting to reinvent it as a more mainstream academic vehicle.

Billig asserts that in the same year Hans Eysenck became a member of the comite de patronage of GRECE's Nouvelle Ecole.

Hans Eysenck was too self-absorbed, too preoccupied with his own aspirations as a great scientist to harbor specific political aims.

Harder to brush off was the impression that Hans Eysenck was insensitive, even willfully blind to the way his work played out in a wider political context.

Hans Eysenck did not want to believe, almost to the point of utter refusal, that his work gave succor to right-wing racialist groups.

Hans Eysenck's defence was that he did not shy away from publishing or being interviewed in controversial publications, and that he did not necessarily share their editorial viewpoint.

Hans Eysenck described his views in the introduction to Race, Education and Intelligence:.

Hans Eysenck was criticised by scientific skeptics for endorsing fringe science.

Henry Gordon for example stated that Hans Eysenck's viewpoint was "incredibly naive" because many of the parapsychology experiments he cited as evidence contained serious problems and were never replicated.

Magician and skeptic James Randi noted that Hans Eysenck had supported fraudulent psychics as genuine and had not mentioned their sleight of hand.

Hans Eysenck included the entire editorial in his 1998 book Intelligence: A New Look.

Grossarth and Hans Eysenck claimed the existence of a "cancer prone personality" were supposed to have a risk of dying of cancer 121 times greater than controls, when exposed to the carcinogen physical factor tobacco smoking.

In 2019,26 of Hans Eysenck's papers were "considered unsafe" by an enquiry on behalf of King's College London.