26 Facts About Kantian ethics

Kantian ethics refers to a deontological ethical theory developed by German philosopher Immanuel Kant that is based on the notion that: "It is impossible to think of anything at all in the world, or indeed even beyond it, that could be considered good without limitation except a good will.

Kantian ethics did not attempt to prescribe specific action, but instructed that reason should be used to determine how to behave.

Foundation of Kant's Kantian ethics is the categorical imperative, for which he provides four formulations.

Kantian ethics thus believed that a perfectly rational being must be perfectly moral, because a perfectly rational being subjectively finds it necessary to do what is rationally necessary.

Kantian ethics belongs to it as sovereign when, as lawgiving, he is not subject to the will of any other.

Related searches

Kantian ethics's promised Metaphysics of Morals, however, was much delayed and did not appear until its two parts, The Doctrine of Right and The Doctrine of Virtue, were published separately in 1797 and 1798.

Kantian ethics proposes that action should be based on communication between those involved, in which their interests and intentions are discussed so they can be understood by all.

Kantian ethics's argues that the rejection of certain principles, such as deception and coercion, provides a starting point for basic conceptions of justice, which she argues are more determinate for human beings that the more abstract principles of equality or liberty.

Kantian ethics gives the example of Smith, who visits his friend in hospital out of duty, rather than because of the friendship; he argues that this visit seems morally lacking because it is motivated by the wrong thing.

Kantian ethics's argues that, seen this way, duty neither reveals a deficiency in one's natural inclinations to act, nor undermines the motives and feelings that are essential to friendship.

Kantian ethics first argued that Kantian ethics provides no specific information about what people should do because Kant's moral law is solely a principle of non-contradiction.

Kantian ethics argued that Kant's ethics lack any content and so cannot constitute a supreme principle of morality.

Kantian ethics used the example of helping the poor: if everyone helped the poor, there would be no poor left to help, so beneficence would be impossible if universalized, making it immoral according to Kant's model.

Kantian ethics argued that all modern ethical systems share two problematic characteristics: first, they make a metaphysical claim about the nature of humanity, which must be accepted for the system to have any normative force; and second, the system benefits the interests of certain people, often over those of others.

Kantian ethics further attempted to undermine key concepts in Kant's moral psychology, such as the will and pure reason.

Under the Kantian ethics model, reason is a fundamentally different motive to desire because it has the capacity to stand back from a situation and make an independent decision.

Kantian ethics commentators have argued that Nietzsche's practical philosophy requires the existence of a self capable of standing back in the Kantian ethics sense.

Virtue Kantian ethics is a form of ethical theory which emphasizes the character of an agent, rather than specific acts; many of its proponents have criticised Kant's deontological approach to Kantian ethics.

Kantian ethics presented virtue ethics as freedom for excellence, which regards freedom as acting in accordance with nature to develop one's virtues.

Kantian ethics, therefore, believed that all humans should have the right to common dignity and respect.

Kantian ethics's argues that Kant's requirement of autonomy would mean that a patient must be able to make a fully informed decision about treatment, making it immoral to perform tests on unknowing patients.

Kantian ethics's proposes that a woman should be treated as a dignified autonomous person, with control over their body, as Kant suggested.

Kantian ethics's believes that the free choice of women would be paramount in Kantian ethics, requiring abortion to be the mother's decision.

Dean Harris has noted that, if Kantian ethics is to be used in the discussion of abortion, it must be decided whether a fetus is an autonomous person.

Alan Soble has noted that more liberal Kantian ethics ethicists believe that, depending on other contextual factors, the consent of women can vindicate their participation in pornography and prostitution.

Related searches

Kantian ethics then challenged Kant's claim that animals have no intrinsic moral worth because they cannot make a moral judgment.