17 Facts About Targeted Killings

1.

Targeted Killings: Law and Morality in an Asymmetrical World is a non-fiction compilation book about targeted killing edited by Claire Finkelstein, Jens David Ohlin, and Andrew Altman.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,822
2.

The conference was titled "Using Targeted Killings Killing to Fight the War on Terror: Philosophical, Moral, and Legal Challenges" and was organized by the University of Pennsylvania Law School.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,823
3.

Targeted Killings wrote the 2008 book Defending Humanity: When Force is Justified and Why with George Fletcher, which was published by Oxford University Press.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,824
4.

Targeted Killings argues for an extension of the definition of combatant to include those who arm themselves and engage in combat roles.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,825
5.

Targeted Killings says that eliminating enemies for purposes of self-defense is justified.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,826
6.

University of Pennsylvania law and philosophy professor Claire Finkelstein writes in "Targeted Killings Killing as Preemptive Action" about the difficulties of rationalizing targeted killing outside of the realm of typical combat between state actors.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,827
7.

Targeted Killings says that any entity wishing to carry out targeted killing should first have to declare war on the targeted parties involved.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,828
8.

Washburn University School of Law professor Craig Martin writes in "Going Medieval: Targeted Killings Killing, Self-Defense and the Jus ad Bellum Regime" that self-defence is not an appropriate rationale for targeted killing because such a justification is restricted to conflicts between state actors.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,829
9.

University of Tulsa School of Law professor Russell Christopher writes in "Imminence in Justified Targeted Killings Killing" that self-defence should be ruled out as a suitable position in several examples of potential conflict.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,830
10.

University of Utah S J Quinney College of Law professor Amos N Guiora discusses "The Importance of Criteria-Based Reasoning in Targeted Killing Decisions" and concludes that instead of combatant commanders in the field, lawyers in consultation with decision algorithms must make decisions on targets.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,831
11.

Targeted Killings says this particular killing was justified and borne out of a rational decision-making process.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,832
12.

Targeted Killings says targeted killing as response to threats and to prevent potential terrorist attacks is justified.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,833
13.

Florida State University Tobias Simon Eminent Scholar Fernando Teson writes in his essay "Targeted Killings Killing in War and Peace: A Philosophical Analysis" that targeted killing is particularly justified against terrorists because they use tactics specifically designed to kill civilians.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,834
14.

University of Pennsylvania School of Law professor Leo Katz writes in "Targeted Killings Killing and the Strategic Use of Self-Defense" that there is a danger of a state government artificially generating instances in which it asserts it must use targeted killing in self-defense.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,835
15.

Targeted Killings warns against situations in which governments find it easier to kill terrorists than to put them through due process of law.

FactSnippet No. 1,952,836
16.

Targeted Killings stated, "this volume provides a valuable entry point for investigating this kaleidoscope of legal and moral issues".

FactSnippet No. 1,952,837
17.

Targeted Killings concluded, "[the book's] main contribution to the discussion lies in its focus on the willing use of violence on a significant scale by an organized group".

FactSnippet No. 1,952,838