Vikramaditya was a legendary king who has been featured in hundreds of traditional stories including those in Baital Pachisi and Singhasan Battisi.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,848 |
Vikramaditya was a legendary king who has been featured in hundreds of traditional stories including those in Baital Pachisi and Singhasan Battisi.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,848 |
Proponents of this theory say that Vikramaditya is mentioned in works dating to before the Gupta era, including Brihathkatha and Gatha Saptashati.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,850 |
Vikramaditya cannot be based on Chandragupta II, since the Gupta capital was at Pataliputra.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,851 |
Legends surrounding Vikramaditya are contradictory, border on the fantastic and are inconsistent with historical facts; no epigraphic, numismatic or literary evidence suggests the existence of a king with the name of Vikramaditya around the first century BCE.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,852 |
Mirashi and DC Sircar, believe that Vikramaditya is probably based on the Gupta king Chandragupta II.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,853 |
In most of the legends Vikramaditya had his capital at Ujjain, although some mention him as king of Pataliputra.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,854 |
Vikramaditya was described as an adversary of the Pratishthana-based king Satavahana in a number of legends.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,855 |
Max Muller believed that the Vikramaditya legends were based on the sixth-century Aulikara king Yashodharman.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,856 |
The earliest work to mention Vikramaditya was probably Brihatkatha, an Indian epic written between the first century BCE and the third century CE in the unattested Paisaci language.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,857 |
Vikramaditya, who prided himself on his generosity, was embarrassed and arranged a debate between Manoratha and 100 non-Buddhist scholars.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,858 |
Vikramaditya then entered Pratishthana in disguise and won over a courtesan.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,859 |
Vikramaditya was her lover for some time before secretly returning to Pataliputra.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,860 |
Vikramaditya later returned to the courtesan's house, where Narasimha met and befriended him.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,861 |
Vikramaditya asked the king to name the child Vikramaditya, and told him that the prince would be known as "Vishamashila" because of his hostility to enemies.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,862 |
Vikramaditya began a campaign to conquer a number of kingdoms and subdued vetalas, rakshasas and other demons.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,863 |
At the beginning of the Kali Yuga, Vikramaditya came from Kailasa and convened an assembly of sages from the Naimisha Forest.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,864 |
Vikramaditya is said to have told Vikramaditya that 1,199 years after him, there would be another great king like him.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,865 |
Political rivalry between the kings is sometimes extended to language, with Vikramaditya supporting Sanskrit and Shalivahana supporting Prakrit.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,866 |
Vikramaditya later arrived from Pratishthana, defeated the Shakas, and began the Vikrama Samvat era to commemorate his victory.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,867 |
Vikramaditya sent his vetala to find the child; the vetala traced Satavahana in Pratishthana, and Vikramaditya led an army there.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,868 |
Vikramaditya offers to cut his body in eight places, and offers his head to the goddess.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,869 |
Vikramaditya began searching for Ayodhya and met Prayaga, the king of tirthas.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,870 |
The Vikramaditya mentioned in Paramartha's fourth–fifth century CE biography of Vasubandhu is generally identified with a Gupta king, such as Skandagupta or Purugupta.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,871 |
Kalidasa is the only figure whose association with Vikramaditya is mentioned in works earlier than Jyotirvidabharana.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,872 |
The Vikramaditya era named after the first, and the Shaka era was associated with the defeat of the Shaka ruler by the second Vikramaditya.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,874 |
The association of the era beginning in 57 BCE with Vikramaditya is not found in any source before the ninth century.
| FactSnippet No. 2,390,875 |