10 Facts About Watchmaker analogy

Watchmaker analogy or watchmaker argument is a teleological argument which states, by way of an analogy, that a design implies a designer, especially intelligent design by an intelligent designer, i e a creator deity.

The watchmaker analogy was given by William Paley in his 1802 book Natural Theology or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity.

The original Watchmaker analogy played a prominent role in natural theology and the "argument from design, " where it was used to support arguments for the existence of God of the universe, in both Christianity and Deism.

Watchmaker analogy believed the natural world was the creation of God and showed the nature of the creator.

Watchmaker analogy believed, therefore, that God must care even more for humanity.

Related searches

Watchmaker analogy published the theory in On the Origin of Species in 1859, and in later editions, he noted responses that he had received:.

Watchmaker analogy makes the argument that the comparison to the lucky construction of a watch is fallacious because proponents of evolution do not consider evolution "lucky".

Watchmaker analogy concludes that evolution is a fair contestant to replace God in the role of watchmaker.

Watchmaker analogy was referenced in the 2005 Kitzmiller v Dover Area School District trial.

The defense's expert witness John Haught noted that both Intelligent Design and the watchmaker analogy are "reformulations" of the same theological argument.