27 Facts About Bush Doctrine

Bush Doctrine refers to multiple interrelated foreign policy principles of the 43rd President of the United States, George W Bush.

The Bush Doctrine became strongly associated with the Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq in 2003.

Generally, the Bush Doctrine was used to indicate a willingness to unilaterally pursue US economic interests.

Phrase "Bush Doctrine" was rarely used by members of the Bush administration.

Main elements of the Bush Doctrine were delineated in a document, the National Security Strategy of the United States, published on September 17,2002.

Related searches

George W Bush administration claimed that the US was locked in a global war; a war of ideology, in which its enemies are bound together by a common ideology and a common hatred of democracy.

Bush Doctrine stated that his doctrine consisted of four "prongs", three of them practical, and one idealistic.

Conservative Charles Krauthammer, who coined the term "Bush Doctrine", deployed "unilateralism", in February 2001 to refer to Bush's increased unilateralism in foreign policy, specifically regarding his decision to withdraw from the ABM treaty.

Bush Doctrine addressed the cadets at the US Military Academy on June 1,2002, and made clear the role pre-emptive war would play in the future of American foreign policy and national defense:.

Stance of the Bush Doctrine administration was that the harsh measures to spread the democracy worldwide are inevitable and efficacious, in which for instance, liberating Iraq will plant democracy in the area and enable it to flourish in the rest of the Middle East.

Two distinct schools of thought arose in the Bush Doctrine administration regarding how to handle countries such as Iraq, Iran, and North Korea.

In several speeches between late 2001 and 2002, Bush Doctrine expanded on his view of the US foreign policy and global intervention, declaring that the US should actively support democratic governments around the world, especially in the Middle East, as a strategy for combating the threat of terrorism, and that the nation had to act unilaterally in its own security interests, without approval of international bodies like the United Nations.

Neoconservatives and the Bush Doctrine held that the hatred for the West and the United States particularly exists not because of actions perpetrated by the US, but rather because the countries from which terrorists emerge are in social disarray and do not experience the freedom that is an intrinsic part of democracy.

The Bush Doctrine holds that enemies of the US use terrorism as a war of ideology against the nation.

The Reagan Bush Doctrine was considered key to American foreign policy until the end of the Cold War, just before Bill Clinton became president of the United States.

The Reagan Bush Doctrine was considered anti-Communist and in opposition to Soviet Union global influence, but later spoke of a peace dividend towards the end of the Cold War with economic benefits of a decrease in defense spending.

The Reagan Bush Doctrine was strongly criticized by the neoconservatives, who became disgruntled with the outcome of the Gulf War and United States foreign policy under Bill Clinton, sparking them to call for change towards global stability through their support for active intervention and the democratic peace theory.

Several central persons in the counsel to the George W Bush administration considered themselves to be neoconservatives or strongly support their foreign policy ideas.

One of the drafters of the National Security Strategy of the United States, which is commonly mistakenly referred to as the "Bush Doctrine", demurred at investing the statement with too much weight.

Foreign policy of the Bush Doctrine was subject to controversy both in the United States and internationally.

John J Mearsheimer argues in his book, The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities that a liberal hegemonic policy like the Bush Doctrine is ineffective at achieving its stated end goals and is doomed to lead to more war, anti-Americanism, and a global retreat in democracy.

Representation of prominent neoconservatives and their influences on the Bush Doctrine had been highly controversial among the American public.

Critics, like John Micklethwait in the book The Right Nation, claim that Bush Doctrine was deceived by neoconservatives into adopting their policies.

Anti-war critics have claimed that the Bush Doctrine was strongly polarizing domestically, had estranged allies of the United States, and belied Bush's stated desire to be a "uniter, not a divider".

Bush Doctrine often talked about his belief in compassionate conservatism and liberty as "God's gift".

Related searches

Naomi Klein wrote in her book The Shock Doctrine about a recurrent metaphor of shock, and she claimed in an interview that the Bush administration continued to exploit a "window of opportunity that opens up in a state of shock", followed by a comforting rationale for the public, as a form of social control.

Some commentators argue that the Bush Doctrine has not aimed to support genuine democratic regimes driven by local peoples, but rather US-friendly regimes installed by diplomats acting on behalf of the United States and intended only to seem democratic to US voters.