20 Facts About Conservapedia

1.

Conservapedia is an English-language, wiki-based, online encyclopedia written from a self-described American conservative and fundamentalist Christian point of view.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,504
2.

Examples of Conservapedia's ideology include its accusations against and strong criticism of former US President Barack Obama—including advocacy of Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories—along with criticisms of atheism, feminism, homosexuality, the Democratic Party, and evolution.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,505
3.

Conservapedia was created in November 2006 by Andrew Schlafly, a Harvard and Princeton-educated attorney and a homeschool advocate.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,506
4.

Conservapedia established the project after reading a student's assignment written using the Common Era notation rather than Anno Domini.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,507
5.

Schlafly expressed the hope Conservapedia would become a general resource for American educators and a counterpoint to the liberal bias that he perceived in Wikipedia.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,508
6.

Regular features on the front page of Conservapedia include links to news articles and blogs that the site's editors consider relevant to conservatism.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,509
7.

Editors of Conservapedia maintain a page titled "Examples of Bias in Wikipedia" that compiles alleged instances of bias or errors on Wikipedia pages.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,510
8.

Conservapedia has editorial policies designed to prevent vandalism and what Schlafly sees as liberal bias.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,511
9.

Site's "Conservapedia Commandments" differ from Wikipedia's editorial policies, which include following a neutral point of view and avoiding original research.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,512
10.

Conservapedia allows users to "use any of the content on this site with or without attribution".

FactSnippet No. 1,143,513
11.

Conservapedia asserts that induced abortion increases the risk of breast cancer, while the scientific consensus is that there is no such association.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,514
12.

Conservapedia has been criticised for its articles regarding the theory of relativity, particularly on their entry titled "Counterexamples to relativity" which lists examples purportedly demonstrating that the theory is incorrect.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,515
13.

Conservapedia has claimed that Wikipedia is "six times more liberal than the American public", a claim that has been labeled "sensational" by Andrew Chung of the Toronto Star.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,516
14.

Some Conservapedia editors urged that the statement be changed or deleted, but Schlafly, a former classmate of Obama, responded by asserting that the Harvard Law Review, the Harvard University legal journal for which Obama and Schlafly worked together, uses racial quotas and stated, "The statement about affirmative action is accurate and will remain in the entry".

FactSnippet No. 1,143,517
15.

Conservapedia project has come under significant criticism for numerous factual inaccuracies and factual relativism.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,518
16.

Conservapedia has been compared to CreationWiki, a wiki written from a creationist perspective, and Theopedia, a wiki with a Reformed theology focus.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,519
17.

Tom Flanagan, a conservative professor of political science at the University of Calgary, has argued that Conservapedia is more about religion, specifically Christianity, than political or social conservatism and that it "is far more guilty of the crime they're attributing to Wikipedia" than Wikipedia itself.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,520
18.

Schlafly and Conservapedia administrators "questioned [Lipson's] credentials and shut down debate".

FactSnippet No. 1,143,521
19.

Exchange, recorded on a Conservapedia page entitled "Lenski dialog", was widely reported on news-aggregating sites and web logs.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,522
20.

Dialogue between Lenski and Conservapedia is noted in Richard Dawkins' The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution in a chapter concerning Lenski's research.

FactSnippet No. 1,143,523