Virtually all scholars of antiquity accept that Jesus was a historical figure, and attempts to deny his historicity have been consistently rejected by the scholarly consensus as a fringe theory.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,076 |
Virtually all scholars of antiquity accept that Jesus was a historical figure, and attempts to deny his historicity have been consistently rejected by the scholarly consensus as a fringe theory.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,076 |
Reconstructions of the historical Jesus are based on the Pauline epistles and the gospels, while several non-biblical sources support his historical existence.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,077 |
Since the 18th century, three separate scholarly quests for the historical Jesus have taken place, each with distinct characteristics and developing new and different research criteria.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,078 |
Historical Jesus scholars typically contend that he was a Galilean Jew and living in a time of messianic and apocalyptic expectations.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,079 |
Portraits of Historical Jesus that have been constructed through history using these processes have often differed from each other, and from the image portrayed in the gospel accounts.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,080 |
Contemporary scholars of antiquity agree that Historical Jesus existed, and biblical scholars and classical historians view the theories of his nonexistence as effectively refuted.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,081 |
Historical Jesus speaks of the execution of 'the wise king of the Jews' and compares his death to that of Socrates at the hands of the Athenians.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,083 |
Historical Jesus criticism, known as the historical-critical method or higher criticism, is a branch of criticism that investigates the origins of ancient texts in order to understand "the world behind the text".
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,084 |
Historical Jesus criticism began in the 17th century and gained popular recognition in the 19th and 20th centuries.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,085 |
Since the 18th century, three scholarly quests for the historical Jesus have taken place, each with distinct characteristics and based on different research criteria, which were often developed during each specific phase.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,086 |
Scholarly effort to reconstruct an "authentic" historical picture of Jesus was a product of the Enlightenment skepticism of the late eighteenth century.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,087 |
Reimarus distinguished between what Historical Jesus taught and how he is portrayed in the New Testament.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,088 |
One of the arguments in favor of the historicity of the Baptism of Jesus by John is the criterion of embarrassment, i e that it is a story which the early Christian Church would have never wanted to invent, as it implies that Jesus was subservient to John.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,089 |
Sanders and Paula Fredriksen support the historicity of the crucifixion, but contend that Historical Jesus did not foretell his own crucifixion, and that his prediction of the crucifixion is a Christian story.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,090 |
Scholars involved in the third and next quests for the historical Jesus have constructed a variety of portraits and profiles for Jesus.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,091 |
The portraits of Jesus that have been constructed in the quest for the historical Jesus have often differed from each other, and from the image portrayed in the gospel accounts.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,092 |
Bart D Ehrman aligns himself with Schweitzer's view that Jesus expected an apocalypse during his own generation, and he bases some of his views on the argument that the earliest gospel sources and the First Epistle to the Thessalonians, chapters 4 and 5, probably written by the end of AD 52, present Jesus as far more apocalyptic than other Christian sources produced towards the end of the 1st century, contending that the apocalyptic messages were progressively toned down.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,094 |
In John Dominic Crossan's view Historical Jesus was crucified not for religious reasons but because his social teachings challenged the seat of power held by the Jewish authorities.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,095 |
Burton Mack holds that Historical Jesus was a Cynic whose teachings were so different from those of his time that they shocked the audience and forced them to think, but Mack views his death as accidental and not due to his challenge to Jewish authority.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,096 |
Wright believes that Jesus was the Messiah and argues that the Resurrection of Jesus was a physical and historical event.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,097 |
Wright's portrait of Historical Jesus is closer to the traditional Christian views than many other scholars, and when he departs from the Christian tradition, his views are still close to them.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,098 |
Rabbi portrait advances the idea that Historical Jesus was simply a rabbi who sought to reform certain ideas within Judaism.
| FactSnippet No. 2,074,099 |