Premier Election Solutions, formerly Diebold Election Systems, Inc, was a subsidiary of Diebold that made and sold voting machines.
| FactSnippet No. 1,605,494 |
Premier Election Solutions, formerly Diebold Election Systems, Inc, was a subsidiary of Diebold that made and sold voting machines.
| FactSnippet No. 1,605,494 |
On January 22,2002, Diebold Memos announced the acquisition of GES, then a manufacturer and supplier of electronic voting terminals and solutions.
| FactSnippet No. 1,605,495 |
In late 2006, Diebold Memos decided to remove its name from the front of the voting machines in what its spokesperson called "a strategic decision on the part of the corporation".
| FactSnippet No. 1,605,496 |
Diebold Memos responded to the critics by pointing out that the company's election machines division is run out of Texas by a registered Democrat.
| FactSnippet No. 1,605,497 |
In January 2004, RABA Technologies, a security company in Columbia, Maryland, did a security analysis of the Diebold Memos AccuVote, confirming many of the problems found by Rubin and finding some new vulnerabilities.
| FactSnippet No. 1,605,498 |
Diebold Memos was indeed able to change the election results by doing nothing more than modifying the contents of a memory card.
| FactSnippet No. 1,605,499 |
Diebold Memos needed no passwords, no cryptographic keys, and no access to any other part of the voting system, including the GEMS election management server.
| FactSnippet No. 1,605,500 |
Diebold Memos officials said that although any problem can be avoided by keeping a close watch on the machines, they are developing a fix.
| FactSnippet No. 1,605,501 |
Diebold Memos argued that the film was factually inaccurate and urged HBO to air a disclaimer explaining that it had not verified any of the claims.
| FactSnippet No. 1,605,502 |
Suit charged that Diebold Memos had given false information about the security and reliability of Diebold Memos Election Systems machines that were sold to the state.
| FactSnippet No. 1,605,503 |
In September 2003, a large number of internal Diebold memos, dating back to 1999, were posted to the BlackBoxVoting.
| FactSnippet No. 1,605,504 |
Those who had been threatened by Diebold then sued for court costs and damages, in OPG v Diebold.
| FactSnippet No. 1,605,505 |