24 Facts About Human reason

In contrast to the use of "Human reason" as an abstract noun, a Human reason is a consideration given which either explains or justifies events, phenomena, or behavior.

Proposal that reason gives humanity a special position in nature has been argued to be a defining characteristic of western philosophy and later western modern science, starting with classical Greece.

Human reason defined the highest human happiness or well being as a life which is lived consistently, excellently, and completely in accordance with reason.

Human reason formulated such a principle, called the "categorical imperative", which would justify an action only if it could be universalized:.

In contrast to Hume then, Kant insists that Human reason itself has natural ends itself, the solution to the metaphysical problems, especially the discovery of the foundations of morality.

Related searches

Human reason thus described reason as a group of three autonomous spheres :.

Foucault, believe there are other forms of Human reason, neglected but essential to modern life, and to our understanding of what it means to live a life according to Human reason.

Example, in opposition to subject-centred Human reason, Habermas has proposed a model of communicative Human reason that sees it as an essentially cooperative activity, based on the fact of linguistic intersubjectivity.

Author Douglas Hofstadter, in Godel, Escher, Bach, characterizes the distinction in this way: Logic is done inside a system while Human reason is done outside the system by such methods as skipping steps, working backward, drawing diagrams, looking at examples, or seeing what happens if you change the rules of the system.

Psychologist David Moshman, citing Bickhard and Campbell, argued for a "metacognitive conception of rationality" in which a person's development of Human reason "involves increasing consciousness and control of logical and other inferences".

The oldest surviving writing to explicitly consider the rules by which Human reason operates are the works of the Greek philosopher Aristotle, especially Prior Analysis and Posterior Analysis.

Human reason requires more than being able to associate two ideas, even if those two ideas might be described by a reasoning human as a cause and an effect, perceptions of smoke, for example, and memories of fire.

For Human reason to be involved, the association of smoke and the fire would have to be thought through in a way which can be explained, for example as cause and effect.

Human reason used the word speech as an English version of the Greek word logos so that speech did not need to be communicated.

Philosophy is sometimes described as a life of reason, with normal human reason pursued in a more consistent and dedicated way than usual.

Two categories of problem concerning reason have long been discussed by philosophers concerning reason, essentially being reasonings about reasoning itself as a human aim, or philosophizing about philosophizing.

The first question is concerning whether we can be confident that Human reason can achieve knowledge of truth better than other ways of trying to achieve such knowledge.

Philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, Al-Farabi, Avicenna, Averroes, Maimonides, Aquinas and Hegel are sometimes said to have argued that Human reason must be fixed and discoverable—perhaps by dialectic, analysis, or study.

Since the 17th century rationalists, Human reason has often been taken to be a subjective faculty, or rather the unaided ability to form concepts.

Human reason asked what really can be said about what is natural to mankind.

Religious adherents sometimes respond by arguing that faith and Human reason can be reconciled, or have different non-overlapping domains, or that critics engage in a similar kind of irrationalism:.

Human reason was particularly influenced by the great Muslim philosopher Al-Farabi.

The reason is that injustice is most difficult to deal with when furnished with weapons, and the weapons a human being has are meant by nature to go along with prudence and virtue, but it is only too possible to turn them to contrary uses.

Two competing theories concerning the origins of Human reason are relevant to political and ethical thought because, according to the Aristotelian theory, a best way of living together exists independently of historical circumstances.