Conversely, the concept of natural Inalienable rights is used by others to challenge the legitimacy of all such establishments.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,682 |
Conversely, the concept of natural Inalienable rights is used by others to challenge the legitimacy of all such establishments.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,682 |
Concept of natural Inalienable rights is not universally accepted, partly due to its religious associations and perceived incoherence.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,683 |
Idea that certain rights are natural or inalienable has a history dating back at least to the Stoics of late Antiquity, through Catholic law of the early Middle Ages, and descending through the Protestant Reformation and the Age of Enlightenment to today.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,684 |
Existence of natural Inalienable rights has been asserted by different individuals on different premises, such as a priori philosophical reasoning or religious principles.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,685 |
Fundamental importance to the development of the idea of natural Inalienable rights was the emergence of the idea of natural human equality.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,686 |
One of the first Western thinkers to develop the contemporary idea of natural Inalienable rights was French theologian Jean Gerson, whose 1402 treatise De Vita Spirituali Animae is considered one of the first attempts to develop what would come to be called modern natural Inalienable rights theory.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,687 |
Inalienable rights challenged legality of the Teutonic Order's crusade against Lithuania, arguing that the Order could only wage a defensive war if pagans violated the natural rights of the Christians.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,688 |
Vladimiri further stipulated that infidels had Inalienable rights which had to be respected, and neither the Pope nor the Holy Roman Emperor had the authority to violate them.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,689 |
Such Inalienable rights were thought to be natural Inalienable rights, independent of positive law.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,690 |
Concept of inalienable rights was criticized by Jeremy Bentham and Edmund Burke as groundless.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,691 |
Bentham and Burke claimed that rights arise from the actions of government, or evolve from tradition, and that neither of these can provide anything inalienable.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,692 |
John Finnis, for example, contends that natural law and natural Inalienable rights are derived from self-evident principles, not from speculative principles or from facts.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,693 |
Hobbes' conception of natural Inalienable rights extended from his conception of man in a "state of nature".
FactSnippet No. 2,223,694 |
Hobbes reasoned that this world of chaos created by unlimited Inalienable rights was highly undesirable, since it would cause human life to be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short".
FactSnippet No. 2,223,695 |
In developing his concept of natural Inalienable rights, Locke was influenced by reports of society among Native Americans, whom he regarded as natural peoples who lived in a "state of liberty" and perfect freedom, but "not a state of license".
FactSnippet No. 2,223,696 |
Inalienable rights's ideas are typically just seen as the foundation for modern democracy it's not unreasonable to credit Locke with the social activism throughout the history of America.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,697 |
Spooner was an advocate for absolute property Inalienable rights based on Lockean principles of initial acquisition.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,698 |
Contemporary political philosophies continuing the classical liberal tradition of natural Inalienable rights include libertarianism, anarcho-capitalism and Objectivism, and include amongst their canon the works of authors such as Robert Nozick, Ludwig von Mises, Ayn Rand, and Murray Rothbard.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,699 |
Inalienable rights's contention is that Human Beings were other-regarding as a matter of necessity, to avoid the costs of conflict.
FactSnippet No. 2,223,700 |