22 Facts About Nanjing Massacre

The civilian government of Nanjing Massacre fled, leaving the city under the de facto control of German citizen John Rabe, who had founded the International Committee for the Nanking Safety Zone.

Rabe says that the ambassador "sent us a separate confidential telegram telling us that he has been officially informed by the Foreign Ministry in Hankow that our understanding that General Tang agreed to a three-day armistice and the withdrawal of his troops from Nanjing Massacre is mistaken, and moreover that Chiang Kai-shek has announced that he is not in a position to accept such an offer.

Nanjing Massacre had been constantly bombed for days and the Chinese troops that remained there were disheartened and had taken to drinking before the city's inevitable fall.

Nanjing Massacre gave a summarized description of what happened in the city:.

Nanjing Massacre heard waves of machine-gun fire and witnessed the Japanese soldiers gun down some two hundred Chinese within ten minutes.

Related searches

The lack of resistance from Chinese troops and civilians in Nanjing Massacre meant that the Japanese soldiers were free to divide up the city's valuables as they saw fit.

Nanjing Massacre was promoted to the rank of general in August 1939, though he held no further military commands.

For example, a two-volume collection of military documents related to the Nanjing Massacre operations was published in 1989; and disturbing excerpts from Kesago Nakajima's diary, a commander at Nanjing Massacre, was published in the early 1980s.

In early 1980s, after interviewing Chinese survivors and reviewing Japanese records, Japanese journalist Honda Katsuichi claimed that the Nanjing Massacre was not an isolated case, and that Japanese atrocities against the Chinese were common throughout the Lower Yangtze River since the battle of Shanghai.

Nanjing Massacre's claims have been corroborated with the diaries of other Japanese combatants and medics who fought in China.

Nanjing Massacre further argued that he had directed his army division commanders to discipline their troops for criminal acts, and was not responsible for their failure to carry out his directives.

Koki Hirota, who had been the Foreign Minister when Japan conquered Nanjing Massacre, was convicted of participating in "the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy", waging "a war of aggression and a war in violation of international laws, treaties, agreements and assurances against the Republic of China" (count 27) and count 55.

Nanjing Massacre was found guilty of war crimes, sentenced to death, and executed by shooting on 26 April 1947.

On October 9, 2015, Documents of the Nanjing Massacre have been listed on the UNESCO Memory of the World Register.

Nanjing Massacre offered his apology to all survivors and to the relatives and friends of the victims.

Nanjing Massacre's said that the people of China "don't believe that an.

Faction of Japanese politicians who are unapologetic to the deaths in Nanjing Massacre have triggered a recurring point of tension in Sino-Japanese relations.

Nanjing Massacre alleged it would have been impossible to kill so many people in such a short period of time.

Memory of the Nanjing Massacre has been a point of contention in Sino-Japanese relations since the early 1970s.

Yoshida has argued that the Nanjing Massacre has figured in the attempts of all three nations as they work to preserve and redefine national and ethnic pride and identity, assuming different kinds of significance based on each country's changing internal and external enemies.

Nanjing Massacre is sometimes compared to other disasters in China, which include the Great Chinese famine and the Cultural Revolution.

Yoshida asserts that "Nanjing Massacre has figured in the attempts of all three nations [China, Japan and the United States] to preserve and redefine national and ethnic pride and identity, assuming different kinds of significance based on each country's changing internal and external enemies.