Rambus Incorporated, founded in 1990, is an American technology company that designs, develops and licenses chip interface technologies and architectures that are used in digital electronics products.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,302 |
Rambus Incorporated, founded in 1990, is an American technology company that designs, develops and licenses chip interface technologies and architectures that are used in digital electronics products.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,302 |
Rambus is well known for inventing RDRAM and for its intellectual property-based litigation following the introduction of DDR-SDRAM memory.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,303 |
Rambus was founded in March, 1990 by electrical and computer engineers, Dr Mike Farmwald and Dr Mark Horowitz.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,304 |
Rambus was incorporated and founded as California company in 1990 and then re-incorporated in the state of Delaware before the company went public in 1997 on the NASDAQ stock exchange under the symbol RMBS.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,305 |
Rambus's technology was based on a very high speed, chip-to-chip interface that was incorporated on dynamic random-access-memory components, processors and controllers, which achieved performance rates over ten times faster than conventional DRAMs.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,306 |
Rambus's interface was an open standard, accessible to all semiconductor companies, such as Intel.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,307 |
Rambus provided companies who licensed its technology a full range of reference designs and engineering services.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,308 |
Rambus purchased Cryptography Research on June 6,2011, for $342.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,309 |
Today, Rambus derives the majority of its annual revenue by licensing its technologies and patents for chip interfaces to its customers.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,310 |
In 2016, Rambus acquired Inphi Memory Interconnect Business, for US$90 million.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,311 |
On November 2,2017, Rambus announced partnership with Interac Association and Samsung Canada to assist in enabling Samsung Pay in Canada.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,312 |
Rambus would be sharing its patent portfolio, including those covering serial links and memory controllers, with NVIDIA.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,313 |
In 2019, Rambus announced that it will move headquarters from Sunnyvale, California to North San Jose, California.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,314 |
In 2021, Rambus announced that it started an expedited share buyback program with Deutsche Bank to buy up roughly $100 million in common stock.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,315 |
Rambus acquired two companies, AnalogX and PLDA, which specialise in physical links for PCIe and CXL protocols.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,316 |
In May 2022, it was announced Rambus had acquired the Montreal-headquartered electronic design company, Hardent.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,317 |
Rambus developed and licensed its XDR DRAM technology, notably used in the PlayStation 3, and more recently XDR2 DRAM.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,318 |
Rambus had been trying to interest memory manufacturers in licensing their proprietary memory interface, and numerous companies had signed non-disclosure agreements to view Rambus' technical data.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,319 |
In 2000, Rambus began filing lawsuits against the largest memory manufacturers, claiming that they owned SDRAM and DDR technology.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,320 |
In May 2001, Rambus was found guilty of fraud for having claimed that it owned SDRAM and DDR technology, and all infringement claims against memory manufacturers were dismissed.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,322 |
In January 2005, Rambus filed four more lawsuits against memory chip makers Hynix Semiconductor, Nanya Technology, Inotera Memories and Infineon Technology claiming that DDR2, GDDR2 and GDDR3 chips contain Rambus technology.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,323 |
In March 2005, Rambus had its claim for patent infringements against Infineon dismissed.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,324 |
Rambus was accused of shredding key documents prior to court hearings, the judge agreed and dismissed Rambus' case against Infineon.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,325 |
In June 2005, Rambus sued one of its strongest proponents, Samsung, the world's largest memory manufacturer, and terminated Samsung's license.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,326 |
In February 2006, Micron Technology sued Rambus, alleging that Rambus had violated RICO and deliberately harmed Micron.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,327 |
On June 20,2011, Rambus went to trial against Micron and Hynix in California, seeking as much as $12.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,328 |
Rambus lost on November 16,2011, in the jury trial and its shares dropped drastically, from $14.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,329 |
On November 16,2011, Rambus lost the antitrust case against Micron Technology and Hynix Semiconductor.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,330 |
Rambus had used these patents to win infringement lawsuits against Nvidia Corp and Hewlett-Packard.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,331 |
Specifically, the FTC complaint asserted that through the use of patent continuations and divisionals, Rambus pursued a strategy of expanding the scope of its patent claims to encompass the emerging SDRAM standard.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,332 |
The FTC's antitrust allegations against Rambus went to trial in the summer of 2003 after the organization formally accused Rambus of anti-competitive behavior the previous June, itself the result of an investigation launched in May 2002 at the behest of the memory manufacturers.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,333 |
On March 26,2008, the jury of the US District Court for the Northern District of California determined that had Rambus acted properly while a member of the standard-setting organization JEDEC during its participating in the early 1990s, finding that the memory manufacturers did not meet their burden of proving antitrust and fraud claims.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,334 |
July 30,2007, the European Commission launched antitrust investigations against Rambus, taking the view that Rambus engaged in intentional deceptive conduct in the context of the standard-setting process for example by not disclosing the existence of the patents which it later claimed were relevant to the adopted standard.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,335 |
Against this background, the Commission provisionally considered that Rambus breached the EC Treaty's rules on abuse of a dominant market position by subsequently claiming unreasonable royalties for the use of those relevant patents.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,336 |
In 2013 and 2014, Rambus settled and agreed on licensing terms with several of the companies involved in long-running disputes.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,337 |
On December 13,2013, Rambus entered an agreement with Micron to let the latter use some of its patents, in exchange for $280 million worth of royalties over seven years.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,338 |
Rambus said these deals were part of a change in strategy to a less litigious, more collaborative approach, distancing themselves from accusations of patent trolling.
| FactSnippet No. 1,553,339 |