38 Facts About Rambus

1.

Rambus Incorporated, founded in 1990, is an American technology company that designs, develops and licenses chip interface technologies and architectures that are used in digital electronics products.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,302
2.

Rambus is well known for inventing RDRAM and for its intellectual property-based litigation following the introduction of DDR-SDRAM memory.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,303
3.

Rambus was founded in March, 1990 by electrical and computer engineers, Dr Mike Farmwald and Dr Mark Horowitz.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,304
4.

Rambus was incorporated and founded as California company in 1990 and then re-incorporated in the state of Delaware before the company went public in 1997 on the NASDAQ stock exchange under the symbol RMBS.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,305
5.

Rambus's technology was based on a very high speed, chip-to-chip interface that was incorporated on dynamic random-access-memory components, processors and controllers, which achieved performance rates over ten times faster than conventional DRAMs.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,306
6.

Rambus's interface was an open standard, accessible to all semiconductor companies, such as Intel.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,307
7.

Rambus provided companies who licensed its technology a full range of reference designs and engineering services.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,308
8.

Rambus purchased Cryptography Research on June 6,2011, for $342.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,309
9.

Today, Rambus derives the majority of its annual revenue by licensing its technologies and patents for chip interfaces to its customers.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,310
10.

In 2016, Rambus acquired Inphi Memory Interconnect Business, for US$90 million.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,311
11.

On November 2,2017, Rambus announced partnership with Interac Association and Samsung Canada to assist in enabling Samsung Pay in Canada.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,312
12.

Rambus would be sharing its patent portfolio, including those covering serial links and memory controllers, with NVIDIA.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,313
13.

In 2019, Rambus announced that it will move headquarters from Sunnyvale, California to North San Jose, California.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,314
14.

In 2021, Rambus announced that it started an expedited share buyback program with Deutsche Bank to buy up roughly $100 million in common stock.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,315
15.

Rambus acquired two companies, AnalogX and PLDA, which specialise in physical links for PCIe and CXL protocols.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,316
16.

In May 2022, it was announced Rambus had acquired the Montreal-headquartered electronic design company, Hardent.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,317
17.

Rambus developed and licensed its XDR DRAM technology, notably used in the PlayStation 3, and more recently XDR2 DRAM.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,318
18.

Rambus had been trying to interest memory manufacturers in licensing their proprietary memory interface, and numerous companies had signed non-disclosure agreements to view Rambus' technical data.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,319
19.

In 2000, Rambus began filing lawsuits against the largest memory manufacturers, claiming that they owned SDRAM and DDR technology.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,320
20.

Seven manufacturers, including Samsung, quickly settled with Rambus and agreed to pay royalties on SDRAM and DDR memory.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,321
21.

In May 2001, Rambus was found guilty of fraud for having claimed that it owned SDRAM and DDR technology, and all infringement claims against memory manufacturers were dismissed.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,322
22.

In January 2005, Rambus filed four more lawsuits against memory chip makers Hynix Semiconductor, Nanya Technology, Inotera Memories and Infineon Technology claiming that DDR2, GDDR2 and GDDR3 chips contain Rambus technology.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,323
23.

In March 2005, Rambus had its claim for patent infringements against Infineon dismissed.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,324
24.

Rambus was accused of shredding key documents prior to court hearings, the judge agreed and dismissed Rambus' case against Infineon.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,325
25.

In June 2005, Rambus sued one of its strongest proponents, Samsung, the world's largest memory manufacturer, and terminated Samsung's license.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,326
26.

In February 2006, Micron Technology sued Rambus, alleging that Rambus had violated RICO and deliberately harmed Micron.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,327
27.

On June 20,2011, Rambus went to trial against Micron and Hynix in California, seeking as much as $12.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,328
28.

Rambus lost on November 16,2011, in the jury trial and its shares dropped drastically, from $14.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,329
29.

On November 16,2011, Rambus lost the antitrust case against Micron Technology and Hynix Semiconductor.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,330
30.

Rambus had used these patents to win infringement lawsuits against Nvidia Corp and Hewlett-Packard.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,331
31.

Specifically, the FTC complaint asserted that through the use of patent continuations and divisionals, Rambus pursued a strategy of expanding the scope of its patent claims to encompass the emerging SDRAM standard.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,332
32.

The FTC's antitrust allegations against Rambus went to trial in the summer of 2003 after the organization formally accused Rambus of anti-competitive behavior the previous June, itself the result of an investigation launched in May 2002 at the behest of the memory manufacturers.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,333
33.

On March 26,2008, the jury of the US District Court for the Northern District of California determined that had Rambus acted properly while a member of the standard-setting organization JEDEC during its participating in the early 1990s, finding that the memory manufacturers did not meet their burden of proving antitrust and fraud claims.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,334
34.

July 30,2007, the European Commission launched antitrust investigations against Rambus, taking the view that Rambus engaged in intentional deceptive conduct in the context of the standard-setting process for example by not disclosing the existence of the patents which it later claimed were relevant to the adopted standard.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,335
35.

Against this background, the Commission provisionally considered that Rambus breached the EC Treaty's rules on abuse of a dominant market position by subsequently claiming unreasonable royalties for the use of those relevant patents.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,336
36.

In 2013 and 2014, Rambus settled and agreed on licensing terms with several of the companies involved in long-running disputes.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,337
37.

On December 13,2013, Rambus entered an agreement with Micron to let the latter use some of its patents, in exchange for $280 million worth of royalties over seven years.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,338
38.

Rambus said these deals were part of a change in strategy to a less litigious, more collaborative approach, distancing themselves from accusations of patent trolling.

FactSnippet No. 1,553,339