The name "Tibeto-Burman language" was first applied to this group in 1856 by James Logan, who added Karen in 1858.
FactSnippet No. 1,388,776 |
The name "Tibeto-Burman language" was first applied to this group in 1856 by James Logan, who added Karen in 1858.
FactSnippet No. 1,388,776 |
In spite of the popularity of this classification, first proposed by Kuhn and Conrady, and promoted by Paul Benedict and later James Matisoff, Tibeto-Burman language has not been demonstrated to be a valid family in its own right.
FactSnippet No. 1,388,777 |
The grouping of the Bai Tibeto-Burman language, with one million speakers in Yunnan, is particularly controversial, with some workers suggesting that it is a sister Tibeto-Burman language to Chinese.
FactSnippet No. 1,388,778 |
Mru Tibeto-Burman language is spoken by a small group in the Chittagong Hill Tracts between Bangladesh and Myanmar.
FactSnippet No. 1,388,780 |
Shafer's tentative classification took an agnostic position and did not recognize Tibeto-Burman language, but placed Chinese on the same level as the other branches of a Sino-Tibetan family.
FactSnippet No. 1,388,781 |
Tibeto-Burman language retained Tai–Kadai within the family, allegedly at the insistence of colleagues, despite his personal belief that they were not related.
FactSnippet No. 1,388,782 |
Tibeto-Burman language is then divided into several branches, some of them geographic conveniences rather than linguistic proposals:.
FactSnippet No. 1,388,783 |
Internal structure of Tibeto-Burman language is tentatively classified as follows by Matisoff in the final release of the Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus .
FactSnippet No. 1,388,784 |
Randy LaPolla proposed a Rung branch of Tibeto-Burman language, based on morphological evidence, but this is not widely accepted.
FactSnippet No. 1,388,785 |