Alexander Rosenberg is an American philosopher and novelist.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,848 |
Alexander Rosenberg is an American philosopher and novelist.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,848 |
Alexander Rosenberg is the R Taylor Cole Professor of Philosophy at Duke University, well known for contributions to philosophy of biology and philosophy of economics.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,849 |
Alexander Rosenberg has taught philosophy at Dalhousie University, Syracuse University, University of California, Riverside, University of Georgia and, since 2000, at Duke University.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,850 |
Alexander Rosenberg has been a visiting professor at the University of Minnesota, the University of California, Santa Cruz, Oxford University, the Australian National University and Bristol University.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,851 |
Alexander Rosenberg won the Lakatos Award in 1993 and was the National Phi Beta Kappa Romanell Lecturer in 2006.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,852 |
Alexander Rosenberg later shifted to work on issues in the philosophy of science that are raised by biology.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,853 |
Alexander Rosenberg became especially interested in the relationship between molecular biology and other parts of biology.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,854 |
Alexander Rosenberg introduced the concept of supervenience to the treatment of intertheoretical relations in biology, soon after Donald Davidson began to exploit Richard Hare's notion in the philosophy of psychology.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,855 |
Alexander Rosenberg is among the few biologists and fewer philosophers of science who reject the consensus view that combines physicalism with antireductionism.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,856 |
Alexander Rosenberg coauthored an influential book on David Hume with Tom Beauchamp, Hume and the Problem of Causation, arguing that Hume was not a skeptic about induction but an opponent of rationalist theories of inductive inference.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,857 |
Alex Alexander Rosenberg asserts the radical opinion that there is no enduring self on atheism.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,858 |
In 2011 Alexander Rosenberg published a defense of what he called "Scientism"—the claim that "the persistent questions" people ask about the nature of reality, the purpose of things, the foundations of value and morality, the way the mind works, the basis of personal identity, and the course of human history, could all be answered by the resources of science.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,859 |
In 2018 Alexander Rosenberg published How History Gets Things Wrong: The Neuroscience of our Addiction to Stories.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,860 |
Alexander Rosenberg admits that therefore the intentionality of inscriptions and speech cannot be derived from the intentionality of thought.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,861 |
Ivey argued that Alexander Rosenberg's call for a Darwinian approach to historical explanation failed to acknowledge the limitations of past attempts to apply this approach and the complicated relationship in practice between Darwinian and humanistic methods in history.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,862 |
Alexander Rosenberg's treatment of fitness as a supervenient property, which is an undefined concept in the theory of natural selection, is criticized by Brandon and Beatty.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,863 |
Explanatory role of the principle of natural selection and the nature of evolutionary probabilities defended by Alexander Rosenberg were subject to counter arguments by Brandon and later by Denis Walsh.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,864 |
Alexander Rosenberg has acknowledged that the novel is based on the wartime experiences of people he knew.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,866 |
Alexander Rosenberg has admitted the incongruity of writing a narrative, given his attack on the form in The Atheist's Guide to Reality.
FactSnippet No. 1,609,867 |